澳洲突擊隊 vs. 林恩麦克达德

5 (100%) 1 投票

本網站的所有者是一個前突擊隊 – 佢唔係突擊隊同 #8217, 係殺害兒童, 係左翼 looneys 似麦克达德. 呢啲小丑係不可能控制突擊隊員嘅. 我哋唔可以被控制.

如果你正在尋找我請願支持 3 現代突擊隊的同事係度晒.

請願書唔再活躍.

呢個女人過任何一個塔利班士兵都更恐怖.

Australian Commando vs. Lyn McDade

係官方同白痴邊個任命呢個白痴林恩麦克达德.

部長助理國防部長布鲁斯布鲁斯·比尔森今日宣布了兩項重要的軍事司法任命, 將進一步提高澳洲軍事司法系統的公正性和公平度。.

作為對參議院外交事務的回應, 國防和貿易參考委員會關於澳洲軍事司法系統有效性的報告, 澳洲政府同意設立一個法定獨立嘅軍事檢察主任 (dmp) 在准將級.

"dmp 的法定委任是一項重大的改變, 集中了檢控權力 33 命令召集當局成為單一獨立機構,"布鲁斯·比尔森先生說.

T佢係最大嘅廢話可能的負載 – 有一個共同努力, 以摧毀軍事法院系統確實發生. 估係乜回事? 佢企圖政治上控制軍事. 獲得突擊隊員, 其餘嘅會跟隨.

"這項任命將加強嚴格, fairness and timeliness of military justice by removing perceptions of command influence. It will also promote confidence among Australian Defence Force personnel regarding the independence and impartiality of the appointee and the functions of the Office.”

D 人係邊度得到佢哋嘅大腦? 提升信心? 廢話 – 它完全摧毀了它. 網絡已進入超載的攻擊佢同軍隊, 因為它似乎有一個問題, 而家等部隊解決呢一. 我好驚訝麦克达德仲在生.

佢係前文職律師邊個冇以前嘅軍事經驗 (梗係冇澳洲步兵戰鬥徽章), but who was brought into the new military justice system to aid in efficiency and effectiveness. Has she accomplished this? “There has been widespread discontent with the take-no-prisoners approach of the Director of Military Prosecutions, 林恩麦克达德. 軍事律師同澳洲人, 佢哋認為以前受到偏見嘅行為聽證的輕微罪行已經無休止地轉移到法院。唔係一個好兆頭, 當軍事司法系統嘅首席, 係在一個非委託軍官同佢嘅士兵之間, 喺美國。. is called non-judicial punishment – and placing it in formal military courts. It would quite literally bring military justice to a halt in the U.S., 原因人手單位, 並帶嚟咗一個唔誠實同猜疑嘅氣氛.

的背景…

澳洲的精銳部隊在阿富汗交火中留下五兒童死亡, 誓言要清除佢哋嘅名.

三人參與咗2月 12, 2009 夜間突襲等五兒童死亡, 另兩人受傷, 兩名成人受傷.

一名涉嫌叛亂分子被殺.

軍事檢察官林恩麦克达德說, 佢長時間嘅調查導致的指控 – 佢哋嘅第一種在國防和 #8217 的歷史.

一名士兵被控過失殺人, 另外兩人面臨較小的指控, 包括不遵守命令和危險行為.

Australian Commando vs. Lyn McDade
澳洲突擊隊 vs. 林恩麦克达德

一輪嘅網站評論…

一項針對澳洲陸軍同 #8217 嘅激烈攻勢, 試圖推翻佢嘅決定, 起訴三名突擊隊員在阿富汗發動嘅致命襲擊。.

士兵, 退伍軍人’ associations and conservative lawyers have joined the attack on the army’s chief prosecutor, 林恩麦克达德. She has been labelled abitch”, 一個 ”dumb arseand afing disgraceon internet forums including the army’s Facebook page.

超過 14,000 people have signed an online petition asking Governor-General Quentin Bryce to help dismiss the charges. 超過 1000 signatures have been added each day this week, including those of serving members of the Australian Defence Force.

Quentin Bryce is another total bloody idiot appointed for political correctness rather than capability. Has shown herself to be a total left wing looney as well.

The petition slams the unprecedented decision last week by Brigadier McDade to charge an officer and two commandos with serious offences, including manslaughter, over a 2009 raid in Afghanistan’s Oruzgan province. Six Afghans were killed; five were children.

The petition claims the case willparalyse troops in the fieldand that the soldiers werecarrying out their duties and … legitimate orders”.

It is understood no Australian soldier has ever been charged with such offences against civilians in battle.

Melbourne University law professor Tim McCormack last night said the petition and the abusive online campaign were an improper intervention in the legal process and could prejudice the trial of the commandos.

This attempt to influence the independence of the prosecutor is an interference in a fundamental aspect of the military justice system, and perhaps raises issues of contempt,” Professor McCormack says.

The abuse of Brigadier McDadewhose post of Director of Military Prosecutions is relatively new in the military legal system, created in 2006 – appears to have been sharpened by the fact that she is a woman and that she has not risen through the regular ranks.

On one military online forum she is described as acowardwho hasgone madwith power. The army’s Facebook page contains references toload of shit lawyers” 和 ”gutless cowardly politicians”.

On a commando veteranswebsite, one writer wrongly accuses the brigadier of losing a military laptop containing classified information, another saysin my experience bellicose 50-year-old females make excellent parking inspectors”. Another says thatshould another soldier die … [McDade] will have put the round in the chamber”.

Senior officers are watching the case closely and many have told 年齡 they are deeply concerned about the prosecution. While many support the petition, some are worried by the aggressive tone of the commentary. Lawyers preparing for the courts martial are aware of the abusive comments.

Brigadier McDade has previously declined to speak to 年齡 about the case, and in a recent news release said she would not comment in the media.

The Queensland president of the 4th Royal Australia Regiment (4RAR) Association, Alan Price, says the prosecution is mostly apublic relations exercise to satisfy [的] egoof Brigadier McDade and will givethe Taliban another weapon to fight our soldiers with”.

Another high-profile critic is David Flint, the former law professor and former head of Australians for a Constitutional Monarchy. In an online article for the conservative magazine, Quadrant, he says a military prosecutor should not have sole authority to launch prosecutions and that Parliament should abolish her office.

One of Brigadier McDade’s former legal colleagues from the Northern Territory, barrister Mark Johnson, says she would be unconcerned by the abuse. ”I’m sure it would affect her … but I think if there is anyone who is going to hold the line because of what she believes is the right thing to do, then Lyn is that person.

Defence is still finalising a location for the courts martial, which could begin in November. A panel of soldiers will sit on the court martial panel, acting as a military jury. Some legal experts say public criticism and extensive pleas of the commandosinnocence could influence the soldiers who will have to decide whether to convict or not.

麥科馬克教授都話, 係極不可能嘅總督嘅干預, 鑑於軍事檢察署署長辦公室嘅獨立立場.

麦克达德準將在 adf 有兩個仔. 佢有超過 25 年’ 作為一名軍事律師嘅經驗, 也曾擔任大律師, 副驗屍官同民事檢察官.

留低評論

你可能都中意呢啲文

使用你嘅 facebook 帳戶進行評論